By Michael Hoffman
In late September the Zionists will once again advance their cartoon version of history by means of Hollywood, their “court" of first resort. Tinseltown is the ideal venue for projecting fantasies disguised as historical truth
and trying and convicting heretics and dissidents. The target in
question is English historian David Irving, author of more than 20
best-selling history books and the leading military historian of National Socialist Germany.
In the year 2000 he brought to trial a libel
suit in London against Deborah Lipstadt, a dreary thought cop from
Emory University in Georgia who has made it her life’s work to dream up a
new category of heretic (“Holocaust denier”),
reflective of the hysteria and megalomania of the religion of
Holocaustianity, of which she is high priestess. The hobby horse of one
obscure professor soon became a marching order for the media of the entire western world. The story behind that chilling Orwellian perversity is itself deserving of a book-length study.
Thanks to Deborah, many writers and historians now bear the career-withering “ holocaust denier" stigmata, branded both by new media (Google search engine, Wikipedia)
and the senile print media. Imagine if every atheist who was a chemist,
astronomer, geographer, novelist or sculptor, who did not believe that
Jesus Christ rose from the dead, would have to endure going through life
perpetually branded by the media as a “Resurrection-denier”?
Of course in our modern world one may deny the cental tenet of Christendom all one likes. Hollywood director James Cameron lavishly funds the Resurrection denial of Israeli activist Simcha Jacobvici.
In the Israeli state there is a tourist trade based on selling maps and
taking tours of what the Israelis describe as the tomb where the bones
of Jesus rot, but Cameron and co. bear no contumely for it.
Acting as his own attorney, Irving went it alone against Lipstadt and her team of lawyers and researchers in
the masonic courts of injustice, for which Britian is notorious. In
spite of a few failings (chiefly in deciding not to call German-American
chemist/historian Germar Rudolf as a witness), Irving mounted a
magnificent defense against a legal team consisting of lawyers for
England’s aristocracy, funded by the bottomless pockets of movie mogul
Steven Spielberg, and with the Israeli ambassador seated in the courtoom
with his retinue of gun-toting bodyguards — in case the presiding judge didn’t get the message about which way the verdict should go.
Unfortunately, there is no revisionist book about the Irving trial as there is for the show trial of Ernst Zündel in Canada. In the breach, on September 30 Hollywood will tender “Denial," its mendacious spin on the ignominious Lipstadt, who was so cowardly she hid behind her high-priced lawyers and refused to take the stand and endure Mr. Irving’s cross-examination (it will be interesting to see how the film will handle this embarrassing, self-indicting fact).
The
part of the slim and good-looking Irving of that era is played by
Timothy Spall, a chubby thespian with a flaccid jaw who typically
portrays villains. The role of the plain-looking Prof. Lipstadt is
undertaken by the glamorous Rachel Weisz, who is usually cast as a
heroine.
This
is a morality play in a shades-of-gray world. When Christians endeavor
to slay a dragon we are told to lighten up, don’t be a fanatic, embrace
diverse viewpoints. When the Zionists prepare to slay a revisionist
reptile, existential factors are banished and a pure struggle between
cosmic good and evil takes center stage.
We will soon place online a video of a speech this writer delivered
at Mr. Irving’s “Real History” Cincinnati conference more than a decade
ago, concerning Lipstadt’s use of the theological term “Amalek” to
denigrate him.
In 2006, when that speech was first placed on Google’s fledgling online video channel, friends of Lipstadt had it removed. She stated afterward: “The
video, which was a virulent attack on me by Hoffman, was introduced by
David Irving. I am sorry the video is gone. It was such a blatant
example of the venomous hatred these folks feel towards Jews. It also
was a prime illustration of their delusional conspiracy theories. I had
used it in a number of speeches to illustrate their thinking.”
Needless
to say, there was absolutely “no hatred toward Jews” in the video. Deb
can’t seem to refrain from recklessly spouting this “Jew hater” trope. It's a Pavlovian response to any informed criticism of a Judaic academic that is accurate — and
wounding because it is accurate. By ominously terming Irving “Amalek,”
Prof. Lipstadt rendered him, in terms of rabbinic theology, a target for
extermination (how ironic). Pointing this out is only “Jew hate” in a
Wonderland world where any defiance of the impostures of the Holy People
is automatically suspect; again we observe the relentless megalomania.
The Internet Movie Data Base (IMDB) has a message board online about the “Denial” movie.
This is an opportunity to reach new people with “holocaust” revisionism
before the movie is released. For instance, a link has been provided
at IMDB to this writer’s column on the Charlie Hebdo/ -Tales of the Holohoax hypocrisy: www.imdb.com/title/tt4645330/board/threads/
The IMDB is read by many show business insiders. This is a chance to reach them as well as the general public.
No comments:
Post a Comment