‘Almost in unison, media scoundrels support Clinton to succeed Obama – without explaining the grave threat to world peace and fundamental freedoms she represents.
The New York Times is typical – virtually serving as her press agent, abandoning journalistic ethics and principles entirely – oozing support for a ruthlessly dangerous presidential aspirant.
Saying she “sacrificed personal ambition for her husband’s political career” ignored the nation’s first ever husband/wife co-presidency, seeking a third term – a rogue partnership, serving monied interests over popular ones for eight painful years.’
Read more
No comments:
Post a Comment