Dr. Jeffrey S. Gurock, a Jewish history professor at Yeshiva University,
argues in a new book that Jews would never have gained the immense
power and influence they possess in America today had the fake "Holocaust" narrative of WWII
not been so successfully promoted and institutionalized. Without the
"Holocaust", Dr. Gurock contends that Jews in America would have never
achieved "the level of empowerment and agency that we associate with American Jews today," The Times of Israel recently reported.
Both Weber and Johnson recognize that although the "Holocaust" narrative is an important element of Jewish power and influence in the West today, and a weaponized narrative of history that demonizes and pathologizes European identity and ethnocentrism while strengthening Jewish identity and ethnocentrism, it is not the foundational source of this power and influence.
In Johnson's controversial and thought provoking essay entitled Dealing with the Holocaust, he argues:
However, as the article highlighted above notes, the false "Holocaust" narrative has facilitated the Jewish takeover of America and the wider Western world. The fake "Holocaust" story is indeed central to maintaining, perpetuating, and reinforcing Jewish power, and is the backbone of the entire "New World Order" agenda. The "lessons of the Holocaust" that Western governments and society have adopted and institutionalized - "anti-racism", "diversity", "multiculturalism", "tolerance", and fighting "anti-Semitism" (i.e., stating facts about Jews and questioning their version of events, both in a historical and contemporary context) - are the blueprint for White genocide in America and the Western world.
Regardless as to whether or not the fake "Holocaust" narrative is the ultimate source of Jewish power and influence - it clearly isn't - the fact remains that this weaponized narrative of history is central to maintaining and perpetuating their current power and influence in the West, as well as justifying the anti-White, genocidal policies we see being promoted and implemented all around us.
"Things could have been much worse had the cataclysm of the Holocaust not happened," said Dr. Jeffrey S. Gurock recently over lunch at a Jerusalem café.Mark Weber and Greg Johnson, two important scholars that I have learned a great deal from, correctly argue that Jewish power and influence in America and the wider Western world was already substantial prior to WWII. Thus, they aver, the political and cultural power stemming from the "Holocaust" is "not so much a source of Jewish-Zionist power as it is an expression of it," as Weber wrote in a 2009 article entitled How Relevant is Holocaust Revisionism?
A statement like this is hard to swallow if you don’t realize that his new book, “The Holocaust Averted: An Alternate History of American Jewry, 1938-1967,” deals with counterfactual history, a speculative exploration of what-ifs, and the author is in no way dismissive of the murder of six million Jews at the hands of the Nazis.
What Gurock demonstrates in his book is that World War II was a major turning point in American Jewish history, and that many positive things came out of it for American Jews as well as for US-Israel relations. Had key moments in the run-up to and during the course of the war played out differently, the Holocaust may not have happened. Gurock posits that instead, Jews in America would have had to “run for cover.” They would have had to assume—and maintain—a low profile, never achieving the level of empowerment and agency that we associate with American Jews today. [...]
While historians look back in history to understand what happened (or in the case of counterfactual history, what did not, or could have, happened) Gurock said the ultimate purpose of “The Holocaust Averted” is to get y Jews to think about their present and future.
“The book teaches important lessons about the post-war and contemporary Jewish condition. It emphasizes what WWII meant for Jewish empowerment and Jewish activism,” he said.
Both Weber and Johnson recognize that although the "Holocaust" narrative is an important element of Jewish power and influence in the West today, and a weaponized narrative of history that demonizes and pathologizes European identity and ethnocentrism while strengthening Jewish identity and ethnocentrism, it is not the foundational source of this power and influence.
In Johnson's controversial and thought provoking essay entitled Dealing with the Holocaust, he argues:
Before the Second World War, Jews already had an enormous amount of power in the United States: enough power to deliver the United States into two World Wars, for instance. Jewish power was based on over-representation in banking, business, law, politics, academia, and the news and entertainment media.Weber and Johnson's arguments are entirely valid in my opinion: the "Holocaust" narrative is not the foundational source of Jewish power, so simply debunking this narrative (which is rather easy to do) will not end the Jewish tyranny suffocating America and the West. Exposing and refuting the fake "Holocaust" narrative in and of itself will not end the immense power and influence Jews have in America and the West. It will certainly be a step in the right direction though, and I believe it is an important endeavor to undertake because the truth matters to me.
If the holocaust suddenly lost its potency as a tool of moral intimidation, Jews surely have the talent, money, power, and ill-will to foist a new one on us. Whites will never be free until we identify and defeat the real sources of Jewish power. [...]
However, as the article highlighted above notes, the false "Holocaust" narrative has facilitated the Jewish takeover of America and the wider Western world. The fake "Holocaust" story is indeed central to maintaining, perpetuating, and reinforcing Jewish power, and is the backbone of the entire "New World Order" agenda. The "lessons of the Holocaust" that Western governments and society have adopted and institutionalized - "anti-racism", "diversity", "multiculturalism", "tolerance", and fighting "anti-Semitism" (i.e., stating facts about Jews and questioning their version of events, both in a historical and contemporary context) - are the blueprint for White genocide in America and the Western world.
Regardless as to whether or not the fake "Holocaust" narrative is the ultimate source of Jewish power and influence - it clearly isn't - the fact remains that this weaponized narrative of history is central to maintaining and perpetuating their current power and influence in the West, as well as justifying the anti-White, genocidal policies we see being promoted and implemented all around us.
Monday, June 1, 2015
Gilad Atzmon explains the subversion of the pro-Palestine cause by the Jewish left
Editor's note: Gilad Atzmon, an internationally renowned musician, philosopher, and writer born in Israel, is currently on a speaking tour to promote his latest book entitled A to Zion: The Definitive Israeli Lexicon,
as well as address the Jewish subversion of the pro-Palestinian
movement. On Monday, May 11th, Atzmon spoke at a public library in San
Diego County, an event I was able to attend. We had a nice conversation
and I was able to ask him a question following his presentation.
What follows is a Q&A I conducted with Atzmon via email shortly after his speech in San Diego. I hope to continue this dialogue in the near future. There are many more questions I'd like to ask him.
JF: In your talk, you described Jewish leftists infiltrating and ultimately undermining the Palestinian Solidarity movement - why? What is their ultimate goal?
GA: In an interview a few years back, Philip Weiss, the chief editor of the Jewish pro-Palestinian website Mondoweiss, admitted to me in plain terms that, in his eyes, pro-Palestinian activism serves "Jewish self interests."
Such a Jewish activity conveys a (misleading) image of Jewish political pluralism. It suggests that not all Jews are "bad," Jewish politics can even be ethical and universal.
Evidently, Jewish liberals are angry with me for unveiling the deceit that is embedded in such an attitude. They have invested a great effort attempting to silence me, and for a good reason - I have produced some persuasive arguments suggesting that Jewish solidarity is not the solution, it is actually the core of the problem.
In fact, the Jewish Left is far more problematic and dangerous than hardcore right-wing Zionism. Zionism is a celebration of the Jewish "symptom," so to speak. The so-called "anti" are set to deny the rest of us an access to the symptom.
If Jewish power is defined as the power to suppress the discussion on Jewish power, Mondoweiss, Jewish Voices for Peace, Democracy Now!, Noam Chomsky and others are there to pursue with that task day and night.
They crudely restrict the boundaries of the discourse by means of political correctness. Mondoweiss went as far as banning any criticism of Israel within the context of Jewishness. This duplicitous attempt to subvert the discourse worked for a while. However, not anymore, and I take some credit for it.
Together with other thinkers and commentators, I have been pointing at a controlled opposition apparatus that is committed solely to "Jewish self interests," as Philip Weiss was either brave or foolish enough to admit back in 2011.
JF: How is the Palestinian Solidarity movement or pro-Palestine cause now framed in Jewish terms and related to overall Jewish interests?
GA: As I showed in my San Diego talk, while in the past it was the Palestinian right of return that defined the Palestinian cause in ethical, political and legal terms, the growing domination of liberal Jews within the movement diluted this elementary right. It was replaced by a tsunami of misleading and faulty terminology that was set to appease some diaspora Jews and whatever is left of the Israeli Left. All of that was done at the expense of the Palestinians.
While the right of return located the Palestinian plight within historical, political, legal and moral context, the newly imposed terminology i.e., "End of Occupation", "Colonialism", "Apartheid", and even the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement (post-2010), is legitimizing the Jewish state within pre-1967 borders. It dismisses the refugees, Gaza, and the Palestinian diaspora’s plight entirely.
It instead engages only with issues that are relevant to the West Bank, and why? Because the West Bank is subject of an internal Jewish debate. While the vast majority of world Jewry sees the West Bank as an integral part of greater Eretz Yisrael, a few liberal Jews in Manhattan insist that Tel Aviv is the true fulfillment of the Zionist project. The meaning of it is tragic. Thanks to the growing domination of Jews within the Palestinian Solidarity movement, the entire movement has been reduced into a Jewish internal debate. This may explain why the solidarity movement has achieved nothing as far as Palestine is concerned. It was born to fail and it achieved its goal.
In short, the Palestinian Solidarity movement is now a Jewish movement devoted to solidarity with the Jews. This could have been an amusing development unless there was a tragedy of another people involved.
JF: Can you comment on how the Palestinian Solidarity movement has become part of the larger overall social justice movement (LGBT rights, immigrant rights, feminism, etc.) in recent years?
GA: The Palestinian Solidarity movement becoming a part of a large social justice movement could have been a great and welcome development. Yet, one may wonder, is the breaking of society into identity politics sectors or factions such a great development? Obviously not.
In the last six decades the working people have been plundered repeatedly. The people who used to be called the working class are now the workless class, and many of them are underclass by now. But why?
Unlike the (imaginary) "old good labor-oriented Left" that promised to unite us all against capital and the Empire, the neo-Marxists and the Frankfurt Yeshiva enthusiasts invested a huge effort breaking the cohesiveness of the working people and Western society in general.
Instead of bringing people together, which was the old Left ideal, we are now split into tribal sectors. We are transformed into a matrix of a manifold of Jew-like tribal groupings defined largely by biology (color, gender, sexual preferences, race, etc). However, it is hardly surprising that Jewish identity merchants are way better than anyone else in being Jews. Jews have been practicing Jewish tribal survival strategies (identity politics and ethnocentrism) for 3000 years. This form of tribal politics is pretty new to gentiles and this may explain why identity politics has failed those who were lame enough to follow it in the first place.
We are dealing here with a multiplicity of impotent, marginal identity campaigns that are paralyzed by a strong sense of victimhood. The feminists are oppressed by masculinity, the Black is intimidated by the White, the gay is chased by the homophobe, the Muslims and their Islamophobes, and now the Palestinians also have the Zionists. We are dealing with a binary dichotomy between an imaginary and evasive "oppressor" and a concrete and lucid "victim".
But here is the problem: those who indulge in a victimhood narrative end up in a state of paralysis - they learn to blame others yet vindicate themselves. Those who succumb to victimhood never look in the mirror; they never take responsibility for their fate.
For more than a while we have been witnessing a few Western Palestinians and Jewish liberals spreading hollow and misleading terminology that has removed the conflict from Palestine and their resistance; colonialism, apartheid, BDS - everything but building Palestinian rockets or military defiance. This development obviously served the Jewish state. Instead of fighting Palestinian freedom fighters, the conflict was reduced into a meaningless exchange between two Jewish positions.
Though some Western Palestinians and NGOs joined this well-funded corrosive liberal Jewish project, Hamas didn’t fall into this trap. IDF infantry units were minced in Gaza last summer. They were met with fierce Palestinian resistance. While Chomsky debated Dershowitz on some questions to do with "the future of Palestine," young Palestinians were preparing for battle. While the liberal Zionist George Soros’s Open Society funded a BDS LGBT tour in America, young Hamas engineers were digging tunnels and building rockets in Gaza. I am convinced that Palestinian Muslim leaders in Gaza grasped at a certain stage that the struggle for Palestinian queer politics may not be the definitive path toward Palestinian liberation.
http://www.therealistreport.com/2015/06/jewish-historian-argues-fake-holocaust.html
What follows is a Q&A I conducted with Atzmon via email shortly after his speech in San Diego. I hope to continue this dialogue in the near future. There are many more questions I'd like to ask him.
JF: In your talk, you described Jewish leftists infiltrating and ultimately undermining the Palestinian Solidarity movement - why? What is their ultimate goal?
GA: In an interview a few years back, Philip Weiss, the chief editor of the Jewish pro-Palestinian website Mondoweiss, admitted to me in plain terms that, in his eyes, pro-Palestinian activism serves "Jewish self interests."
Such a Jewish activity conveys a (misleading) image of Jewish political pluralism. It suggests that not all Jews are "bad," Jewish politics can even be ethical and universal.
Evidently, Jewish liberals are angry with me for unveiling the deceit that is embedded in such an attitude. They have invested a great effort attempting to silence me, and for a good reason - I have produced some persuasive arguments suggesting that Jewish solidarity is not the solution, it is actually the core of the problem.
In fact, the Jewish Left is far more problematic and dangerous than hardcore right-wing Zionism. Zionism is a celebration of the Jewish "symptom," so to speak. The so-called "anti" are set to deny the rest of us an access to the symptom.
If Jewish power is defined as the power to suppress the discussion on Jewish power, Mondoweiss, Jewish Voices for Peace, Democracy Now!, Noam Chomsky and others are there to pursue with that task day and night.
They crudely restrict the boundaries of the discourse by means of political correctness. Mondoweiss went as far as banning any criticism of Israel within the context of Jewishness. This duplicitous attempt to subvert the discourse worked for a while. However, not anymore, and I take some credit for it.
Together with other thinkers and commentators, I have been pointing at a controlled opposition apparatus that is committed solely to "Jewish self interests," as Philip Weiss was either brave or foolish enough to admit back in 2011.
JF: How is the Palestinian Solidarity movement or pro-Palestine cause now framed in Jewish terms and related to overall Jewish interests?
GA: As I showed in my San Diego talk, while in the past it was the Palestinian right of return that defined the Palestinian cause in ethical, political and legal terms, the growing domination of liberal Jews within the movement diluted this elementary right. It was replaced by a tsunami of misleading and faulty terminology that was set to appease some diaspora Jews and whatever is left of the Israeli Left. All of that was done at the expense of the Palestinians.
While the right of return located the Palestinian plight within historical, political, legal and moral context, the newly imposed terminology i.e., "End of Occupation", "Colonialism", "Apartheid", and even the Boycott, Divestment, and Sanctions movement (post-2010), is legitimizing the Jewish state within pre-1967 borders. It dismisses the refugees, Gaza, and the Palestinian diaspora’s plight entirely.
It instead engages only with issues that are relevant to the West Bank, and why? Because the West Bank is subject of an internal Jewish debate. While the vast majority of world Jewry sees the West Bank as an integral part of greater Eretz Yisrael, a few liberal Jews in Manhattan insist that Tel Aviv is the true fulfillment of the Zionist project. The meaning of it is tragic. Thanks to the growing domination of Jews within the Palestinian Solidarity movement, the entire movement has been reduced into a Jewish internal debate. This may explain why the solidarity movement has achieved nothing as far as Palestine is concerned. It was born to fail and it achieved its goal.
In short, the Palestinian Solidarity movement is now a Jewish movement devoted to solidarity with the Jews. This could have been an amusing development unless there was a tragedy of another people involved.
JF: Can you comment on how the Palestinian Solidarity movement has become part of the larger overall social justice movement (LGBT rights, immigrant rights, feminism, etc.) in recent years?
GA: The Palestinian Solidarity movement becoming a part of a large social justice movement could have been a great and welcome development. Yet, one may wonder, is the breaking of society into identity politics sectors or factions such a great development? Obviously not.
In the last six decades the working people have been plundered repeatedly. The people who used to be called the working class are now the workless class, and many of them are underclass by now. But why?
Unlike the (imaginary) "old good labor-oriented Left" that promised to unite us all against capital and the Empire, the neo-Marxists and the Frankfurt Yeshiva enthusiasts invested a huge effort breaking the cohesiveness of the working people and Western society in general.
Instead of bringing people together, which was the old Left ideal, we are now split into tribal sectors. We are transformed into a matrix of a manifold of Jew-like tribal groupings defined largely by biology (color, gender, sexual preferences, race, etc). However, it is hardly surprising that Jewish identity merchants are way better than anyone else in being Jews. Jews have been practicing Jewish tribal survival strategies (identity politics and ethnocentrism) for 3000 years. This form of tribal politics is pretty new to gentiles and this may explain why identity politics has failed those who were lame enough to follow it in the first place.
We are dealing here with a multiplicity of impotent, marginal identity campaigns that are paralyzed by a strong sense of victimhood. The feminists are oppressed by masculinity, the Black is intimidated by the White, the gay is chased by the homophobe, the Muslims and their Islamophobes, and now the Palestinians also have the Zionists. We are dealing with a binary dichotomy between an imaginary and evasive "oppressor" and a concrete and lucid "victim".
But here is the problem: those who indulge in a victimhood narrative end up in a state of paralysis - they learn to blame others yet vindicate themselves. Those who succumb to victimhood never look in the mirror; they never take responsibility for their fate.
For more than a while we have been witnessing a few Western Palestinians and Jewish liberals spreading hollow and misleading terminology that has removed the conflict from Palestine and their resistance; colonialism, apartheid, BDS - everything but building Palestinian rockets or military defiance. This development obviously served the Jewish state. Instead of fighting Palestinian freedom fighters, the conflict was reduced into a meaningless exchange between two Jewish positions.
Though some Western Palestinians and NGOs joined this well-funded corrosive liberal Jewish project, Hamas didn’t fall into this trap. IDF infantry units were minced in Gaza last summer. They were met with fierce Palestinian resistance. While Chomsky debated Dershowitz on some questions to do with "the future of Palestine," young Palestinians were preparing for battle. While the liberal Zionist George Soros’s Open Society funded a BDS LGBT tour in America, young Hamas engineers were digging tunnels and building rockets in Gaza. I am convinced that Palestinian Muslim leaders in Gaza grasped at a certain stage that the struggle for Palestinian queer politics may not be the definitive path toward Palestinian liberation.
http://www.therealistreport.com/2015/06/jewish-historian-argues-fake-holocaust.html
No comments:
Post a Comment