Israel is playing a greater role in the Republican presidential race than
perhaps ever before.
By Zaid Jilani
May 29, 2015 "Information
Clearing House" - "AlterNet"
- The past year has seen an effective merger between the Republican Party
and Israel's right-wing Likud Party. This is particularly explicit with regards
to the presidential race, where contenders are courting pro-Israel billionaire
Sheldon Adelson, who could instantly unleash tens of millions of dollars to
bolster their candidacies.
As a part of this “Adelson
primary,” as it has been dubbed by the media, these presidential candidates are
taking trips to Israel, where they meet with far-right politicians and
studiously avoid interacting with everyday Palestinians or the occupation. They
then come back and tell fairy tales of a liberal democracy under existential
threat.
Here's who has gone and what they've come back to say.
Rick Santorum: Santorum
has not yet announced, but is considered a likely contender. He
visited Israel last year on a trip organized by the right-wing group
“Patriot Voices.” While there, he called the right-wing outlet Newsmax to give
an
interview. Despite the
tremendous political, economic and military support the United States
provides Israel, Santorum said “the average Israeli knows whose side that John
Kerry and Barack Obama are on, and it's not to protect the security of
Israel.” For Santorum,
re-arming the Israelis as they were assaulting the Gaza Strip while vocally
defending their actions simply wasn't supportive enough.
Scott Walker: Walker
visited Israel this month, and when he returned he wrote a post on Medium
detailing his “reflections.” The
Israel Walker says he saw is “one of the world's most vibrant democracies,” and
one of “America's most important allies.” That's an odd phrasing for a country
that
systematically disenfranchises 4.5 million Palestinians and gives millions
of non-Jews citizenship without the same full legal rights as Jewish
Israelis. Walker also seemed to endorse the Bush administration's foreign
policy, saying he would “take the fight to them before they take the fight to
us,”
which echoed similar remarks by George W. Bush and Dick Cheney in support of
the unprovoked war against Iraq.
Ben Carson: The former
neurosurgeon's strange comments about Israel actually began before he actually
got there. GQ's Jason Zengerle
accompanied Carson on his trip to the country, and witnessed a bizarre
conversation he had with his Israeli guide. He admitted he did not know what the
Knesset (the Israeli legislature) actually did, and had his guide explain it.
After she finished, he responded, “It sounds complex. Why don't they just adopt
the system we have?” When he actually got to Israel, he was quick to draw
conclusions. When informed about foreign fighters ending the Syrian civil war,
he concluded, “It's just like the troublemakers in Ferguson.”
When he returned to the United States, Carson was suddenly an
expert on world affairs, trying to lump in Iran with ISIS. “We need to recognize
that the Shia in Iran are every bit as dangerous, perhaps more dangerous,”
he said, a sectarian warning that could easily be found in the text of an
extremist Saudi cleric.
Carly Fiorina: The
former HP executive
visited Israel in 2010, in a trip widely seen as oriented around courting
pro-Israel political forces. This spring,
she claimed that tensions with Israel are “in no small measure due to
President Obama,” simply ignoring Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's
series of provocative words and actions. She also went further, pledging to
repudiate an Iran deal on her first day in office—essentially rejecting Obama's
diplomatic efforts.
Coming Polarization
Israel is playing a greater role in the GOP presidential race
than perhaps ever before. The Adelson primary is transforming the same political
party that once
harshly clashed with Israeli leadership over its failure to make peace into
one that is indistinguishable from the Likud.
But something else is happening on the Democratic side. While
candidates there are not openly calling for sanctions or cutting aid to Israel,
they're not leaping up to defend it, either. The topic is all but absent in the
Democratic primary, despite the fact that the party is the traditional base of
the pro-Israel lobby.
Polling shows that the party's rising base of young people and racial
minorities is increasingly hostile to Israeli foreign policy, in ways that will
surely at some point impact American policy.
Many in the United States have lamented the increasing
polarization of the Israel issue, but it is that polarization that may finally
give Americans a choice about policy, rather than bipartisan support for Israel,
right or wrong.
No comments:
Post a Comment