CHARLES MANSON GETS TO TALK. WHY NOT HITLER?

CHARLES MANSON GETS TO TALK.

WHY NOT HITLER?

INTRODUCTION TO:

MEIN SIDE OF THE STORY: Key World War II Addresses of Adolf Hitler

*******************************

A scandal erupted in January of 1995 when the incoming Speaker of the U.S. House of Representatives, Newt Gingrich, appointed Christina Jeffrey, a former colleague from Kennesaw State University, to the post of House Historian. The major media “controversy” arose over comments Jeffrey had made in 1986, while evaluating the World War II portion of a program called ‘Facing History and Ourselves’ for the Department of Education.

 

Ms. Jeffrey had written, “The program gives no evidence of balance or objectivity. The Nazi point of view, however unpopular, is still a point of view and is not presented.”  Jewish groups and the national press exploded into a rage over the unearthed comments. False allegations of “anti-Semitism” were hurled at Ms. Jeffrey as the gutless Gingrich left his former colleague to twist in the wind, alone and undefended.

 

Though Jeffrey insisted that the allegations against her were "slanderous and outrageous", it wasn’t enough to silence the rabid attack dogs. True to his ignoble form, Gingrich abruptly fired her, stating, through his spokesman, “her statement was inadmissible on its face ….the historian of the House could never be someone who had uttered those words."

 

Gingrich wasted little rime in throwing his old colleague "under the bus".

 

But what was so bad about her comments? Why the media firestorm? Shouldn’t both sides of every historical event always be presented; simply for no other reason than to satisfy historical curiosity?

 

Our system of justice grants prima facie murderers, rapists and serial killers the opportunity to speak, does it not? Indeed, convicted killers like Charles Manson, David ‘Son of Sam’ Berkowitz, Richard Speck, Jeffrey Dahmer and others have done televised interviews. Even the erroneous and dangerous ranting of Karl Marx is taught, no, glorified, in American Universities. So, what is so gosh-darn dangerous about merely presenting the opinion of Hitler’s Germany?

 

 

Like Manson, serial killers Bundy, Berkowitz and Dahmer were all given the opportunity to speak to a national audience. Why can't Hitler's words be "heard"?

If Hitler's opinions are as evil and as fallacious as it is said to be, then why not present the full story, and then logically refute it? Truth is its own defense, so what is there to fear about simply hearing “the other side”? Do we really believe in “free speech” and “academic freedom” or do we not? Are we like retarded little children that need to be shielded from mere words? Or is somebody hiding something? Hmmm?

In the purportedly American belief that no one has the right to deprive you of access to information, the purpose of putting together Mein Side of the Story is merely to present Germany’s version of the events in regard to the great catastrophic bloodbath known as World War II. This is Hitler’s side of the story, revealed in his own spoken and written words. Only the brief ‘Mein Side’ blurbs and captioned illustrations have been added. A pair of wartime addresses by German Foreign Minister von Ribbentrop and one from Japanese Emperor Hirohito are also included.

 

Foreign Minister Ribbentrop and Japanese Emperor Hirohito also made some very interesting observations and accusations.

The speeches and writings are all 100% authentic. Some have been slightly abridged in order to avoid redundancy and to keep the booklet to a brief length. Modern “court historians” and journalists do not deny the content of these addresses. They can’t. Instead, they simply ignore them, childishly denouncing anyone who does attempt to resurrect them as “Nazi”, or “anti-Semitic."

The common theme that runs throughout these addresses is that Germany, and also Japan, believed that World War II was imposed upon them. You don’t have to agree with that assessment. You don’t have to like it. In fact, you can even laugh at it. But it is their point-of-view, or at least, their stated point-of-view. It is a position that, until now, you have not been permitted to even hear. Indeed, it is only via the miracle of the Internet that these documents have again become accessible to those willing to snoop around and dig them up from the memory hole of buried history.

Do with these words as you will. Just don’t shoot your humble messenger for putting these highly interesting addresses together for your consideration.

http://tomatobubble.com/id821.html