|
THE
FREE-MARKET BILLIONAIRES OF "COMMUNIST" CHINA
By Mike King
|
NY Times: Billionaire Lawmakers Ensure the Rich Are Represented in China’s Legislature
Lawmakers in much of the world are often accused of being in the pockets of billionaires. But there’s a difference in China. Here, the lawmakers are the billionaires.
REBUTTAL BY
You know you're a commie when you criticize
China for being too pro-business. Has the world turned upside down, or what?!
The world turned upside-down! As Obongo's America slides deeper and deeper into a pit of Marxist manure, Communist
China is now open for business; and Sulzberger doesn't like it.
About
30 years
ago, after decades of Mao Tse Tung's failed statist
schemes, genocides and universal backwardness, the Chinese realized
that
natural concepts such as competitive enterprise,
private property and self-reliance were the way to uplift a society. The
dynamic Chinese model of today - along with
America's suicidal off-shoring policies - has lifted, and continues to
lift, hundreds
of millions of people out of poverty. As long as
the personal riches were not stolen or embezzled (a la George Soros),
who bloody cares if the billionaires end up with more wealth than others? And who cares if some of them are serving in the legislature? Wasn't America founded by some of its wealthiest aristocrats?
Are
we to believe that a talentless bureaucrat would
spend the billionaire's money more wisely for the
benefit of society than the man who created the wealth in the first
place?
Would China be better served if lifelong political
hacks and pointy-headed Keynesian academics, who have never so much has
run a lemonade stand, were serving in Parliament
instead?
In addition to being philosophers of the first-rank, Washington and Jefferson were also immensely successful men
of business.
While
watching a recent interview conducted by PBS's
Charlatan Rose, your curious reporter here nearly fell off his chair
when rambling
Rosie's guest, Chinese billionaire Jack Ma of
'Alibaba' fame, summed up the new Chinese way of thinking very
succinctly:
"When
you have a million dollars, it is your money. When you have a billion
dollars, it becomes society's money because you are
always investing it back into the economy to make it grow. You control
the billion dollars, but it's never in your hands
because it is working. If you have a billion dollars, it means you know
how to manage money better than the government."

Pay attention
CIArlie boy. You could actually learn something about economics from this guy.
Right on Jack; right on! Ma continued:
"Competition is supposed to be fun. It doesn't mean you want to hurt the other
guy. Competition makes everybody work harder and smarter."
Even
the purchase
of personal luxury goods benefits the factory
workers at the Mercedes and Rolex plants; does it not? For example, when
it
became apparent that the demagogue Bill Clinton's
1993 luxury tax was damaging yacht sales, this portion of his
"tax-the-rich"
scheme was quickly repealed in order to save the
jobs of those who build the bigger boats! (here) This is what the ignorant libtards of the "occupy" movement, with their simple-minded Marxist mantras of "trickle
down" and "the 1 per centers" fail to grasp. The German-American motivational speaker William Boetcker said
it best in his mini-pamphlet, "The Cannots" (often mistakenly credited to Abraham Lincoln). This ought
to be mandatory reading in every children's asylum (public school) in America:
William Boetcker's
"Cannots" pamphlet explodes the devious demogogery and mendacious
mythology of Marx.
THE
CANNOTS
- You cannot bring about prosperity by discouraging thrift.
- You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong.
- You cannot help little men by tearing down big men.
- You cannot lift the wage earner by pulling down the wage payer.
- You cannot help the poor by destroying the rich.
- You cannot establish sound security on borrowed money.
- You cannot further the brotherhood of man by inciting class hatred.
- You cannot keep out of trouble by spending more than you earn.
- You cannot build character and courage by destroying men's initiative and independence.
- And you cannot help men permanently by doing for them what they can and should do for themselves.
It
is not "the 1%" who are exploiting "the 99%"; but rather the Federal Government (with its massive taxation
and maze of regulations) and the Federal Reserve (with its perpetual inflation) that are the source of America's
declining economic health. Taxing the big bad rich man to the teeth doesn't hurt him as much as it does the working man. The
"Communist" Chinese - who, by the way, have also ended the 'one-child' policy that America's abortion-loving
libtards used to praise so much (here), - now understand the folly of bashing and harassing the entrepreneurial class. Unfortunately, the woefully
uneducated fools and envious losers at Sulzberger's sophist Slimes "cannot" - or will not.

http://www.tomatobubble.com/id793.html

No comments:
Post a Comment