America and its vassal-states use NATO
and the paraphernalia of intimidation in Wales, near a beautiful
countryside where the legendary Prisoner, starring Patrick McGoohan, was
shot. In this prestigious TV series there was a statement made by a
Number 2 about the end of cold war and an incoming "new order". Well,
as we know, Vladimir Putin is our Number 6.
Of course the New World Order is not
perfect. There are still some missing pieces of the puzzle, such huge
countries as Russia, China, Brazil and India. These countries sent some
bricks on the wall of the American window. China is not Latvia. India is
not Malta. Brazil is not Portugal. But being the leader of the global
rebellion against American new order, being too a good neighbour and the
old enemy of the cold war, Russia is the ideal target of the last,
ridiculous and hysterical democratic crusade.
Since 1918 and Lord Curzon and his
sanitary cordon the obsession has been the same. I would say it's even
an old mania, But Edgar Poe had prophesied that modernity would freeze
history and humanity.
Why such a mania? I will quote
provocatively infamous and forgotten
Francis Parker Yockey, a right-wing
American activist, who was murdered in his jail (it was not Guantanamo)
in 1959. A brilliant mind and a theorist of European empire, Yockey
hated America and Soviet Union during the war. But after this war, he
discovers with amazement the cold war and the sudden hatred for ex-ally
Stalin - soon compared to Hitler by our bumptious imaginative
journalists...
Nobody could so be more specific than
him to mark the question. Yockey writes these ironic lines in 1952,
during the famous Prague's trials:
That same barbaric despotism called
the Russian Empire and presided over by the peasant Stalin is today the
only obstacle to the domination of the entire earth by the
instrumentality called United Nations.
And suddenly Russia, who wore the burden
of the war against fascism, became a pariah, having to resist the brave
hatred of ten or more submitted nations.
Because of the Russian rejection of
the atomic weapon ultimatum, Russia found its policy opposed everywhere,
in Austria, in Germany, in Korea, in Finland.
If Russians and foreigners estimate that Putin and his country are isolated today, let us recommend them these lines:
The press-campaign against Russia continued in America and all its European vassal-states.
And American public opinion, in
prompt and unconditional obedience to the American press, switched over
from being anti-German and pro-Russians to being anti-German and
anti-Russian.
This was in 1952... The brave new
American public opinion will always be a serf. And western media wars
against Putin were predictable: remember "The Beginning of the End" of
the Economist when Putin came back to office in 2012. The downing of the
unfortunate Malaysian airplane helped awake our gullible public
opinion. And resilient Malaysia was of course not accidentally targeted.
Yockey writes in his essay that Americans will try to overthrow Stalin - who died only a few months later:
Just as they constantly hoped for an
internal revolution in Germany, so they have hoped for a revolution
against Stalin, a revolution to return to Trotskyism and the fundamental
principle of international bolshevism, a revolution to wipe out
religious, pan-Slav Russian nationalist-imperialism, a revolution which
would embrace the united nations and bring about a millennium...
Religious, pan-Slav Russian nationalist-imperialism...
This expression is very occurring now. Two comments: first, there is
the same reproach made today by inevitable Brzezinski. The inspired
nutty professor declared last 14th of June:
In effect, Russia protects the
integrity of certain basic beliefs that have characterized Christianity,
but in the Russian view, that Christianity is now betraying its
fundamentals.
As a Christian power, and not
post-Christian, like Italy, France or the Vatican (read Brzezinski here
too), Russia must be neutralized.
Second, there are still bolshevists nowadays but they are not Russian. Today's bolshevists are the market bolshevists
- to quote our dear Joe Stiglitz- who destroyed with fascist methods
tens of nations since forty years, following Milton Friedman's ruthless
and maniac agenda.
Yockey adds an interesting remark. Even
imperial, Russia was less dangerous culturally for any European nation
than dreadful ubiquitous American model (who will disagree?):
In the dark days of 1945, many
Europeans embraced the American occupation as the lesser of two evils...
A Russian occupation would be far less dangerous to Europe because of
the abysmal cultural gulf between Russia and the West.
Yockey draws various conclusions.
First, Russia is not the monster that
will cause the apocalypse (we have all the biblical maniacs and re-born
Christians we dream of for that):
The notion that Russia could kill
off the 250,000,000 people of Europe need not be taken seriously. It is a
vile insult to European resources and masculinity... originated no
doubt in the brain of some American writer of science-fantasy stories.
Second, Yockey recognizes the danger of
multiplying European politicians susceptible to accelerate the
disintegration of the continent:
America can siphon up an endless number of Churchill to do its dirty work, despoiling and destroying Europe in a suicidal war.
Through Kosovo, Serbia, Ukraine, Libya,
this is what Washington does these days with the help of formatted elite
and efficient transfers of ideology.
Third, Yockey most optimistically predicts a European reaction (we still can dream...):
By thus playing off Russia against
the American leadership, Europe can bring about its liberation, possibly
even before the third world war.
Source
No comments:
Post a Comment