The culture war comes to videogames. a $70 billion industry worldwide.
"Feminists" like Anita Sarkeesian, left, have touched off a firestorm by claiming videogames are promoting "sexism" and violence against women. The industry seems to be taking her side against their own customers. Males are being demonized. Eric wonders if all this is Illuminati inspired.
"If you have any criticism against the gaming industry journalism, Quinn, or Sarkeesian, it is simple: you are a misogynist pig, guilty of hate crimes, a terrorist, a tin foil hat nutter. "
Eric Bazinet, 36, a factory worker from Quebec "has an interest in truth and is appalled by secrecy and tyranny."
by Eric Bazinet
(henrymakow.com)
Recently, an event "happened" in the independent video gaming industry, referred to as the "Quinnspiracy".
An ex-boyfriend publicly accused a prominent female indie game developer, Zoe Quinn, left, of cheating on him with five persons in the industry/gaming journalism. This exposed many conflicts of interests in gaming journalism, which already had a stained reputation from apparent circle-jerking corruption. Many gamers and developers had been vocal about this for a while. This event blew into huge proportion. It is instigating a war on two fronts -- namely journalistic integrity and sexism-- between gamers and video game websites. Needless to say, it provoked an emotional response from gamers. It seems tailor-made to incite male outrage.
Then this degenerated into what is known as "gamergate" (not to be confused with video gaming website "gamer's gate")
The Quinn bee then claims to have been "doxxed" which means she was hacked and her personal information including bank info and all sensible details about her released on the web by hackers.
She claims harassment and death threats to her and her family by a horde of misogynistic man gamers. (This is a laughable and badly executed deception.)
SITES GANG UP ON MEN
Then, on a massive scale, and I mean a landslide, gaming sites started censoring and attacking all critics of feminists, flagging them as sexist, misogynists etc.
Crying "hate crime," gamer men were as a whole just branded "terrorists" even called "worst than ISIS" based on this false hacking/harassment campaign by "men gamers" a.k.a. "virgin nerds".
Not only are polite and pertinent questions/comments about journalistic integrity turned into accusations of misogyny and hate crimes but most websites involved in the "coverup" publish pieces that supports Quinn and insult men gamers.
The gaming industry's most outspoken feminist, Anita Sarkeesian enters the fray. She is nothing more than an "agent provocateur" who raised $150,000 from feminists to make five short videos to "explore sexism in video games". These videos could be made for nothing.
She uses half-truths, exaggerations and outright lies about games she exposes, arousing lots of angry criticism. The response to this is more accusations of bigotry and aggressive name calling by the whole liberal cabal.
She......claims to have been "doxxed" which means she was hacked and her personal info including bank info and all sensible info released on the web by hackers, cries harassment and death threats to her and her family by a horde of misogynistic man gamers. (This is a laughable and badly executed deception, once again)
Then, on a massive scale, gaming sites are censoring all critics and attacking them..... you get the idea, the very situation is a literal and lame copy/paste of Zoe Quinn's harassment claims. If you have any criticism against the gaming industry journalism, Quinn, or Sarkeesian, it is simple: you are a misogynist pig, guilty of hate crimes, a terrorist, a tin foil hat nutter.
You get censored, your account gets banned. Gamers are outright called scum as a whole and told they aren't wanted by websites that profit from them. The message is clear: gamers are being demonized.
Another person in gaming related to this is a petty man known as Phil Fish, which is deservedly and by far the gaming world's most hated public person. He's fueling the flames of sexism too. He called everyone who criticized Zoe Quinn rapists in a blanket statement on twitter, among other things he says that seem to never have any other purpose other than cultivating hate from gamers towards himself. (He also pretends to have been "doxxed" at the same time as Zoe did.) Here is evidence of Sarkeesian possibly is faking threats to herself.
http://www.returnofkings.com/42602/did-anita-sarkeesian-fake-death-threats-against-herself
She claims she had to leave her home due to these threats, but no police report was ever filed, just the same way Quinn and Fish didn't either.
This is the overview of the story. We are now over two weeks into the conflict, and as fickle as people's attention is, (particularly gamers, please forgive the generalization) this is not going away. It has already generated by far the biggest and most heated discussions ever in video gaming history, and it is an understatement to say gamers love to fight on forums.
So maybe I am losing it but this has the stench of Psy Op all over it. I really needed to come out with this and the only person who could bring awareness about this that I think I can trust is you. I am looking forward to hear from you about this matter.
------
Related:
Evidence Anita Sarkeesian is a Fraud - Not a Real Feminist. Involved in Furry porn.
Anita Sarkeesian Destroyed Provides no evidence for her assertions.
Gamergate-The Community is Eating Itself (The Guardian)
Makow Comment- The violence portrayed in videogames is not healthy. Men need to focus their thoughts on uplifting things. Nevertheless Sarkeesian is an opportunist making big bucks by applying the tired old Marxist-feminist critique to videogames, as feminists have done to the detriment of culture in general. We live in a world where males are not allowed to have any space of their own. Witness female intrusion into football and hockey broadcasts. The gaming industry is a big businesses. It answers to banks. Banks answer to the Illuminati. Do I think this is a psy op? No. It's just the way things are these days. I congratulate men for fighting back so effectively.
First Comment by Dan:
"Journalistic integrity"? We're talking about the industry that inspired half the mass murders and nearly ALL school shootings since 1999.
They've even made video games based on real mass murders inspired by other video games: 'Super Columbine Massacre RPG!' and 'School Shooter: North American Tour 2012' .
Know what the creator of 'Muslim Massacre: The Game of Modern Religious Genocide' said when Muslim groups complained? He said "Muslims need to suck it down and stop getting offended by everything". (The aim of the game is blow every Muslims head off that appears on the screen.)
Though I may think the whole video industry is "of the Devil" and should be banned to begin with, since we all know that's never going to happen, Anita Sarkeesian should take a number and get in line behind Muslims and everybody else that's dehumanized in games. Oh, "Just suck it up, Anita."
Of course, Anita and Zoe are only fronting the 'must be' agenda. Everybody in gaming well knows the industry RIDES on selling sex and violence fantasy primarily to boys, underage to 30. The greater the sense of emasculation in their 'real' world, the greater the susceptibility to chronic addiction to sex and violence fantasy games.
bOiNGBOiNG - Addressing the stupid, intellectually dishonest critique of Anita Sarkeesian
Everyone knows that girl from high school. She's angry, bitter, and emotionally manipulative. She is a bully who lives to tear people down to build herself up. She's the girl you expect to leave behind at graduation. But what happens when these women go to college and enter the workforce? Well, they become feminists, of course! ---- Rachel Edwards
You can find this article permanently at http://henrymakow.com/2014/09/videogamersversusfeminists.html
Articles >>
Henry Makow received his Ph.D. in English Literature from the University of Toronto in 1982. He welcomes your comments at henry@henrymakow.com
[+] Show Comments for " Videogamers at War with "Feminists" "
Below- Incest Survivor Exposed Illuminati Satanists (Updated) - (scroll down)
Bigger Text | Default Text | Smaller Text | ShareThis Facebook Tweet Google + Email
Illuminati Promote Both Sides of Ukraine Crisis?
September 3, 2014
Left, Ukraine Truth Where You'd Least Expect It - The Sept-Oct issue of Foreign Affairs
Since its inception in 1921, the Council on Foreign Relations has been
a key instrument of Illuminati control. From the start, Foreign Affairs has been
its house organ.
When Illuminati errand boys David Cameron and Barack Obama
compare Vladimir Putin to Hitler and castigate Russia for "its aggression,"
an article in Foreign Affairs, Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West's Fault,
totally discredits them.
Is the Illuminati promoting both sides of this conflict?
John Mearsheimer, a West Point grad and US Air Force veteran, is Professor of Political Science at the University of Chicago.
His 2007 book with Stephen Walt, The Israel Lobby and US Foreign Policy was a best seller.
by John Mearsheimer
Why the Ukraine Crisis is the West's Fault
excerpt by henrymakow.com
According to the prevailing wisdom in the West, the Ukraine crisis can be blamed almost entirely on Russian aggression. Russian President Vladimir Putin, the argument goes, annexed Crimea out of a long-standing desire to resuscitate the Soviet empire, and he may eventually go after the rest of Ukraine, as well as other countries in eastern Europe. In this view, the ouster of Ukrainian President Viktor Yanukovych in February 2014 merely provided a pretext for Putin's decision to order Russian forces to seize part of Ukraine.
But this account is wrong: the United States and its European allies share most of the responsibility for the crisis. The taproot of the trouble is NATO enlargement, the central element of a larger strategy to move Ukraine out of Russia's orbit and integrate it into the West. At the same time, the EU's expansion eastward and the West's backing of the pro-democracy movement in Ukraine -- beginning with the Orange Revolution in 2004 -- were critical elements, too.
Since the mid-1990s, Russian leaders have adamantly opposed NATO enlargement, and in recent years, they have made it clear that they would not stand by while their strategically important neighbor turned into a Western bastion. For Putin, the illegal overthrow of Ukraine's democratically elected and pro-Russian president -- which he rightly labeled a "coup" -- was the final straw. He responded by taking Crimea, a peninsula he feared would host a NATO naval base, and by working to destabilize Ukraine until it abandoned its efforts to join the West.
(Putin greeting Ukraine President Petro Poroshenko last week. What's with the obsequious expression on Putin's face? Is Petro a 35 degree Mason and Putin only 32?) Putin's pushback should have come as no surprise. After all, the West had been moving into Russia's backyard and threatening its core strategic interests, a point Putin made emphatically and repeatedly. Elites in the United States and Europe have been blindsided by events only because they subscribe to a flawed view of international politics. They tend to believe that the logic of realism holds little relevance in the twenty-first century and that Europe can be kept whole and free on the basis of such liberal principles as the rule of law, economic interdependence, and democracy.
But this grand scheme went awry in Ukraine. The crisis there shows that realpolitik remains relevant -- and states that ignore it do so at their own peril. U.S. and European leaders blundered in attempting to turn Ukraine into a Western stronghold on Russia's border. Now that the consequences have been laid bare, it would be an even greater mistake to continue this misbegotten policy.
.........
U.S. and European leaders blundered in attempting to turn Ukraine into a Western stronghold on Russia's border. Imagine the American outrage if China built an impressive military alliance and tried to include Canada and Mexico.
......
The United States and its allies should abandon their plan to westernize Ukraine and instead aim to make it a neutral buffer.
Thanks to Krister for bringing this to my attention
Related-
Israel and Putin Maintain Close Ties - Israel Did Not Condemn Crimea Annexation
http://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2014/04/israel-russia-strategic-ties-ukraine.html
Putin Gentle on Israel Pounding of Gaza- Jews find him sympathetic
Remember Iraq? Former US intel officers warn Merkel against NATO images of Ukraine
http://rt.com/usa/184512-vips-memo-merkel-nato/
The Downing of MH17 - Is Israel Involved?
http://bollyn.com/14832/
----------
First Comment from Barry
The Illuminati have a history of promoting both sides of major wars, but is this the case in Ukraine? Going back to the chemical weapon attack in Syria, Putin appeared as the saviour on the world stage and offered a solution. His statesman-like approach and body language gave the impression that he was truly resisting the NWO. Then came the coup d'état in Kiev and the overthrow of a democratically government. Putin responded with the annexation of Crimea, a move to secure Russian strategic interests, which seemed like a reasonable response. The people of Crimea voted to join Russia and the separatists took up positions in Eastern Ukraine. The stage is now set with the Zionist-controlled puppets on one side and Putin on the other.
I hope that Putin is truly resisting the NWO and his speech in Munich certainly gave that impression. But one thing does not make sense in this story. Kiev did not fall in a day. According to Zionist, Victoria Nuland, $5 billion of US cash had been spent to facilitate the transition of Ukraine into the EU. Also, George Soros set up a Foundation in Ukraine, which he has admitted, played a part in events happening today. This raises several questions. Did Putin not see this coming? Surely he was aware of the process taking place to promote the EU and ferment anti-Russian sentiment in Ukraine? It seems that for whatever reason, he did little to counter this subversive process and allowed it to develop.
For sure, we would all like to see Superman appear out of the blue and demolish the evil technocrats who plan to dominate the world. It's a frequent theme in Hollywood movies, and as much as I would like to believe Putin is that man, I am yet to be convinced.
Source
No comments:
Post a Comment