Transcript
Of course, we are aware of the European Union’s
commitment to the full and effective protection
of Human Rights everywhere. After all, The 2012
Nobel Peace Prize
was awarded to the
European Union
(EU) “for over six decades [of contribution] to
the advancement of peace and
reconciliation,
democracy and
human rights
in Europe”.
So, when it comes to the “full and effective
protection” of the Human Rights of indigenous
peoples, you might wonder, how did the European
Union react when, less than two years later, the
people of the Occupied Palestinian Territories,
which is indigenous to the area, was subjected
to arbitrary detention and torture – prohibited
by the International Covenant on Civil and
Political Rights – collective punishment –
prohibited by the Third Geneva Convention – and
eventually to a downright massacre at the hands
of the Israeli armed forces, a blood bath which
Israel’s PR machine labelled “Operation
Protective Edge”, in which war crimes were
committed by Israel – such as deliberate attacks
on schools where displaced residents were
sheltering in
Gaza
– and which violated the right to life of more
than 2,100 Palestinian citizens, of which “1,474
are believed to have been civilians, including
501 children and 257 women”, according to
United Nations figures?
Of course, one can almost hear the objection:
“Surely, the United Nations’ Human Rights
Council does not consider the Human Rights
situation in the Occupied Palestinian
Territories to fall under the Rights of
Indigenous Peoples, but rather under Agenda Item
7, see
Resolution S-21/1
and
Report A/HRC/27/76”.
And yes, that is correct: a
bureaucratic vermin hiding behind paperwork
couldn’t have put it better.
So let’s have a look at what happened at the
United Nations when
Resolution S-21/1
was discussed, along with the massacre Israel
had inflicted on Gaza. Let’s see what happened
at
A/HRC/27,
a session called by the Human Rights Council on
the 22nd
of September 2014.
Representatives of states from nearly two-thirds
of the world took the floor and condemned those
atrocities. And, to be sure, delegates from the
European Union member states were present in the
room, scattered here and there, but guess what?
Not one of them said a word – with the notable
exception of Ireland (and one wonder what
sanctions are awaiting the Republic of Ireland
for daring to break ranks from its masters in
Brussels). Because you see, following the lead
of the United States of America and – of course
– Israel, the Nobel Prize winner European Union,
ever obedient to any signal coming from across
the pond, decided to boycott the session:
evidently, the massacre of more than 500
children was not considered important enough to
get its representatives out of bed… or, one must
think, they all must have had more important
things to do.
So, the next time you hear a spokesperson for
the EU announcing their “unwavering commitment”
to an end of impunity for war crimes, or giving
a passionate speech on the importance of
“fulfilling, protecting and promoting Human
Rights everywhere”, just remember this:
on that day, the European Union chose to remain
silent.
There is just one question that should be
addressed to those who are ostensibly in charge:
how do you think posterity and history will
judge your behaviour? Because – rest assured –
we won’t forget. And neither will they.
No comments:
Post a Comment