A LOGICAL DEBUNKING OF ATHEISM
|
CHAPTER 11
Karl Loves Chuckie
Excerpted from: 'The God of
Logic: A Deductive Debunking of Unscientific Atheism'
By: Mike King
|
THE GOD
OF LOGIC
A Deductive Debunking of Unscientific
Atheism
8.5 x 11 / 125 Pages / 200 illustrations
/ b/w
Color Cover: Leggy Fish, Satan,
Stalin, Hawking, Nye, Marx, Darwin
|
 |
"Darwin's work is most important and
suits my purpose in that it provides a basis in natural science for the historical class struggle."
Communist, Atheist NWO front man Karl Marx
|
In light of what we have learned in preceding chapters, a
reasonable man must by now be wondering how such a Great
Fairy Tale could possibly have become so enthroned, so
entrenched, and so widely accepted by otherwise intelligent people
who ought to have known better. If Classical Science and Reason
were not the forces that propelled Unscientific Evolutionary
Atheism to such unassailable heights, then what did?
There were two essential factors that contributed to Evolution’s “fast start”,
meteoric rise, and continuing supremacy:
1. Growing
19th Century Skepticism Concerning Biblical Literalism
2. The Powerful International Force of Marxist-“Progressive”-Liberal Politics
By the time that Darwin had set pen to paper, many among the European
and American Intelligentsia were having their doubts about the literal accounts of the Book of Genesis. They weren’t
necessarily Atheists. Indeed, Darwin himself was an Agnostic, not an Atheist.
But many were thirsty for an
alternative explanation of Creation. These reasonable doubts had thus
predisposed the Intellectual Class to accepting a different
explanation for the mystery of life. The soil of many educated
minds had already been loosened and fertilized before Darwin even published Origin of Species.
The 2nd (and most significant)
element of Darwin’s
instant success has to do with politics. Even more so than
money, politics can be the most corruptive force created by man.
As with any other historical myth, it was the power of politicized force that exalted and sustained Evolution.
And make no mistake; the rise of Darwinian Evolution has always been steeped in the corruptive culture of politics;
of the Leftish type.
Recall that Soviet
Comrade Oparin (under Stalin’s supervision) gave us the “Primordial Soup”. Communist
lover Urey gave us a rigged amino acid experiment. The
pro-Communist ACLU brought us the circus of the Scopes Monkey Trial.
Marxist Hollywood brought us one ridiculous Straw Man version
of Inherit the Wind after another after another. Son
of a Communist Gould brought us “Punctuated Equilibrium”. The pattern is unmistakable. The question is: why?
The
ink
in Darwin’s 1859 Origin of Species was barely dry before the
two man-gods of the logically flawed ideology of Communism,
Friedrich Engels and Karl Marx, began promoting Darwin’s work.
Engels had actually acquired one of the first 1200 copies of Darwin’s clap-trap.
Follow this sequence of events.
November 24, 1859: Darwin publishes Origin of Species
November 27-30, 1859: Engels acquires of the very first copies and sends
a letter to Marx telling him: (1)
"Darwin,
by the way, whom I'm just reading now, is absolutely splendid". (2)
December 19, 1860: Marx writes a letter to Engels telling him that Darwin’s book provides the natural-history foundation
for the Communist viewpoint:
“These
last four weeks, I have read all sorts of things. Among others, Darwin's book ….this is the book which contains the
basis on natural history for our view. (3) (emphasis
added)
January
16, 1861: Marx writes an excited letter to his Communist friend
Ferdinand Lassalle, the founder of the International Socialist movement in Germany:
“Darwin’s work is most important and suits my purpose in
that it provides a basis in natural science for the historical class struggle.” (4) (emphasis added)
June 18, 1862: Marx had already re-read Origin of Species, and again writes to Engels: “I am amused at
Darwin, into whom I looked again” (5)
1862:
Marx quotes Darwin again within his Theories of Surplus Value:
"In his splendid work, Darwin did not realize that by discovering the 'geometrical progression'
in the animal and plant kingdom, he overthrew Malthus theory.” (6)
German Communist leader Wilhelm Liebknecht
later described just how excited the 19th Century Communist leaders all were about the new theory:
"When Darwin drew the conclusions from his research work and
brought them to the knowledge of the public, we spoke of nothing else for months but Darwin and the
enormous significance of his scientific discoveries.” (7) (emphasis added)
Though not directly connected to them, Darwin (left) was heavily promoted
by Marx & Darwin.
Historian Richard Weikart revealed that Marx had started to attend "a series
of lectures by Thomas Henry Huxley on evolution.”
Huxley,
and many in his family, were afflicted with severe, generational
mental health problems. This may, or may not, account for
Huxley’s odd obsession with passionately promoting a theory
that had no evidence behind it, other than the minor variations
in finch beaks. For his fanatical promotion of Evolution,
the blustering biologist became known as “Darwin’s Bulldog” (8)
Huxley was 'Darwin's Bulldog'
Why would
a scientific truth need a “bulldog” to promote and defend it anyway? As the Philosopher St. Augustine once observed,
“The truth is like a lion; you don't have to defend it. Let it loose; it will defend itself.' (9) After a century and a half of searching for
millions of magical missing links, Darwinism still requires a whole pack of “bulldogs” to defend it.
In the 2nd
Edition of Das Kapital, Marx included two explicit
references to Darwin and evolution in which he related Darwin's
theory to his own opinion about production and technology
development. Marx referred to Origin of Species as "epoch-making work”, and went on to compare
Darwin’s view of organs to his own bizarre view of tools and manufacturing.
In a book review of Das Kapital, Engels wrote that Marx was:
"…striving to establish the same gradual process of transformation demonstrated by Darwin in natural
history as a law in the social field." (10)
.
June 16, 1873: Marx sends Darwin an autographed copy of Das Kapital,
with the words:
Mr. Charles Darwin, On the part of his sincere admirer - Karl
Marx. (11)
October, 1873: Darwin writes back to Marx, thanking him for having sent his work:
"I believe that we both earnestly desire the extension of knowledge.
(12)
Marx’s
admiration for Darwin’s work had little to do with
Science. The Communists believed that Darwin provided a
perspective that suited the goals of Atheistic Communism. And what
exactly were, and still are, the goals of Marxism, and its
little brother, “Liberalism / Progressivism”?
.
Many people remain under the mistaken impression
that Marxism represents a legitimate political-economic theory. It is not.
Behind it’s empty promise of
a “workers’ paradise” and “social justice”, Marx’s Communist Manifesto and Das
Kapital are just intellectual masks for a global scheme of intense government centralization. Marxism specifically calls for heavy income taxes, a Central Bank with a monopoly on credit,
abolition
of private land ownership and inheritance, state control of
communication, education, agriculture, transportation, manufacturing,
medicine, and abolition of religion. Marx refers to this
totalitarian scheme as “the dictatorship of the proletariat”.
It is important to note that Marx himself was
merely an artificially puffed up “front man” for much bigger movers and shakers, “behind the scenes”.
It’s a fascinating tale, but one for another time.
Marx’s cult followers (Reds)
promoted violence, class envy, and hostility towards
free markets, family, business, tradition, Christianity and
religion. In addition to the angry misfits and maladjusted criminals
who still worship Marx, there are many well-meaning idealists
who fall, hook, line and sinker for his poisonous promises of
a better world with “equality” and prosperity for all.
Communist icon Vladimir Lenin would later refer to these
types as “useful idiots”. We know them to this day as “liberals” or “progressives”.
In years to come, these naïve and unthinking idealists will help the Reds greatly.
The
influence
of Marxism, combined with the rapid spread of liberalism /
progressivism, will grow throughout the second half of the
1800’s, and blossom during the 1900’s. After the first
successful Marxist revolution in 1918, the Russian Tsar
and his beautiful family were brutally murdered. Soon
afterwards, Winston Churchill described International Communism as
follows:
.
“This worldwide conspiracy for the overthrow
of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, envious malevolence, and
impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played, as a modern writer, Mrs.
Webster, has so ably shown, a definitely recognizable part in the tragedy of the French Revolution.
It has
been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the 19th Century; and now at
last this band of
extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great
cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people
by the hair of their heads and have become practically the
undisputed masters of that enormous empire." (13)
.
Famed writer, historian, philosopher and Soviet dissident Aleksandr Solzhenitsyn described the Bolshevik
years:
“More of my countrymen suffered horrific crimes at their blood-stained hands than any people or nation
ever suffered in the entirety of human history. It cannot be overstated. Bolshevism committed the
greatest human slaughter of all time” (14) (emphasis added)
Churchill once
exposed the Communist Conspiracy to create a world based on "arrested development'. So did Solzhenitsyn.
Over the next 30 years, the Atheist Bolshevik-Communists of the new Soviet Union then proceeded
to murder as many as 50 million Russian Christians. That’s the kind of stuff that happens when men replace God.
Now, listen up, for this is critical. The
Marxist / Liberal hostility towards Christianity has nothing to
do with their disbelief in the creation account of the Book
of Genesis. The reason why the Left is so often hostile towards Christianity and all religion in general is because
religion equips its followers with an internal sense
of right and wrong. Good behavior among individuals and groups
leads to civil societies. Moral and virtuous people can take
care of themselves, their families, and even the less fortunate
among their community, without the need for an all powerful governmental “welfare state”.
On the other hand, a degenerate and dependent
“proletariat” can not only be easily controlled, but can also be used to rise up and overthrow the targeted ruling
class (of which the Church was part of). Once the “Capitalists” and clerics are displaced and murdered,
all that lofty talk about “workers’ paradise” goes out the window! Have a look at George Orwell’s
Animal Farm and you will understand.
The
observation that morality presents an obstacle to tyranny was best articulated by Samuel Adams, one of America’s most
influential ‘Founding Fathers”:
"It is in the Interest of Tyrants to reduce the People to Ignorance and Vice. The
Religion and public Liberty of a People are intimately
connected; their Interests are interwoven, they cannot subsist
separately;
and therefore they rise and fall together. For this Reason, it
is always observable, that those who are combined
to destroy the People's liberties practice every Art to poison their Morals." (15) (emphasis
added)
In his historic Farewell
Address to Congress and the country, George Washington said:
“Of all the dispositions and habits which lead to political prosperity, religion and morality
are indispensable supports. In vain would that man claim the tribute of patriotism, who should labor to subvert these great
pillars of human happiness, these firmest props of the duties of men and citizens.
The
mere politician, equally with the pious man, ought to respect
and to cherish them. A volume could not trace all their
connections with private and public felicity. Let it simply be asked:
Where is the security for property, for reputation, for life, if the sense of religious obligation desert the oaths
which are the instruments of investigation in courts of justice? (emphasis added)
And
let us with caution indulge the supposition that morality can
be maintained without religion. Whatever may be conceded to the
influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure,
reason and experience both forbid us to expect that national
morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.” (16)
What a difference between the philosophy of
America’s wise and virtuous founders and the goofball nonsense of the amoral Marx and Engels!
Washington & Adams linked God & morality to liberty
Essayist Brandon Smith adds this observation about the revolutionary
Marxist need to remove the public internal morality compass:
You see, our consciences pose a threat to the corrupt forces which seek to rule humanity as if it were a Global ant colony.
It is not enough for the PRC (Predatory Ruling Class) to essentially enslave humanity. The PRC must also corrupt the people, especially children. A morally ‘illiterate’ populace will never even recognize the evil of tyranny, let alone rise up against their ‘control-freak’ masters. They are too busy chasing dollars, buying stuff they don’t need, getting drunk, watching TV trash, worshipping sports heroes, and having cheap, loveless sex. Throw these “proles” a few anti-depressants now and then and they’ll not rebel against their beloved PRC. This theme was brilliantly prophesied in George Orwell’s 1984 as well as Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.
What better way for the Reds & Liberals to “poison
morals” than to tear down the religion which instills them? And what better way to tear down religion than to replace
the God of Intelligent Creation with the god of Dummy Darwinism?
No comments:
Post a Comment