The horrible thing about the Two
Minutes Hate was not that one was
obliged to act a part, but that it was
impossible to avoid joining it ...
A hideous ecstasy of fear and
vindictiveness, a desire to kill, to
torture, to smash faces in with a
sledgehammer, seemed to flow through the
whole group of people like an electric
current, turning one even against one's
will into a grimacing, screaming lunatic
- George Orwell, 1984
July
30, 2014
So
Obama, Merkel, Cameron, Hollande and Italian Premier
Matteo Renzi - let's call them the Fab Five - get on
a video conference call to muster their courage and
"increase pressure" asking for a cease-fire in Gaza.
Later in the day, Israel's Benjamin "Bibi" Netanyahu
delivers his answer, in plain language: he remains
dead set on achieving his version of a Final
Solution to Gaza. [1] With or without "pressure".
So what's left for the Fab Five after having their
illustrious Western collective behinds solemnly
kicked? They decide to dump Gaza and instead
sanction Russia - again! How brilliant is that as an
exit strategy?
Spectacular non-entity Tony Blinken, who doubles as
deputy national security adviser to Barack Obama,
was keen to stress to Western corporate media that
the unruly Eurotrash mob is now "determined to act".
No, not against Israel because of Gaza; against
Russia because of Ukraine. Such a lovely Orwellian
symmetry: the extended Two Minutes Hate from Israel
towards Gazans morphs into the extended Two Minutes
Hate from the "West" towards Russia, mirroring the
extended Two Minutes Hate from Kiev towards Eastern
Ukrainians.
Not even Hollywood could come up with such a plot;
Israel gets away with unlawful premeditated mass
murder of civilians, while Russia gets framed for a
(smaller-scale) airborne mass murder of civilians
that has all the makings of being set up by the Kiev
vassals of Russia's Western "partners".
Here I have exposed how sanctions, sanctions,
sanctions is the one and only official Obama
administration "policy" on Russia. On top of the
next European Union sanctions, coming soon, the US
will be piling up - what else - more sanctions.
After all, Washington is so "concerned" that Moscow
will sooner or later invade Ukraine; that would
certainly, and finally, answer all those In God We
Trust prayers.
Where we stand now
Let's follow the facts. Washington from the get-go
said it was Russian President Vladimir Putin's
missile that downed MH17. They swore they had
evidence. Like in "We know. Trust us". The
historical record for the past 60 years at least
shows they cannot be trusted. There was never any
evidence. Just spin.
Moscow, via the Defense Ministry, presented hard
evidence. And called for an unbiased international
investigation. Washington ignored it all - the call
and the hard evidence.
The US Navy, crammed with state-of-the-art missile
defense radars, has been in the Black Sea for weeks
now. As much as the Russians, they have tracked
every particle flying over Ukraine. The NSA goes for
signals intelligence; the National
Geospatial-Intelligence Agency goes for phenomena in
the imagery realm; the Defense Intelligence Agency
adds Humint; there's the CIA; and there's the
all-seeing, all-knowing Director of National
Intelligence. How come all this trillion-dollar Full
Spectrum Dominance apparatus cannot come up with a
single, conclusive piece of evidence?
The only risible "evidence" presented so far
pictures the acronym salad of US intel agencies
spending their time reading blogs and Twittering. As
in the State Department head in Kiev twittering
satellite imagery that the New York Times parroted
"proved" Russia is shelling Ukraine from across the
border. The proverbial "senior US officials" even
had to tersely admit on the record they have no
proof whatsoever about "Putin's missile". If they
had, NATO would be ready to flip burgers in Red
Square.
Based on the wealth of info now in the open, the top
probability of what caused the MH17 tragedy was an
R-60M air-to-air missile shot from a Ukrainian Su-25
- and not a BUK (there's also the possibility of a
double down; first an R-60M and then a BUK). The
R-60M is very fast, with an ideal engagement
distance of up to five kilometers. That's how far
the Su-25 detected by the Russians (they showed the
graphics) was from MH17.
SBU - Ukrainian intel - for its part confiscated the
recordings of Kiev control tower talking to MH17.
That would certainly explain why MH17 was overflying
a war zone (Malaysian Airlines revealed they were
forced to). Hefty bets can be made the recordings
are now being "doctored".
Then there are the black boxes, which will not de
decoded by the Malaysians or by the Dutch, but by
the Brits - acting under Washington's orders. As The
Saker blogger summed up the view of top Russian
specialists, "the Brits will now let the NSA falsify
the data and that falsification will be coordinated
with the SBU in Kiev which will eventually release
the recordings who will fully 'confirm' the
'authenticity' of the NSA-doctored recordings from
the UK." To make it more palatable, and erase
suspicions about Anglo-American foul play, the Dutch
will announce it. Everyone should be forewarned.
NATO heads, for their part, are droolin'. Kiev's
forces/militias will hold "joint exercises" with the
North Atlantic Treaty Organization in Ukraine in
slightly over a month from now, on September 1; red
alert applies, because this is when Ukrainian
President Petro Poroshenko said the slow motion
ethnic cleansing of Donbass will be finished.
As for the R2P ("responsibility to protect") angle,
it sounds quite improbable. True, Moscow can always
say that unless the slow motion ethnic cleansing of
Donbass stops they will recognize the Donetsk and
Luhansk Republics. In that case, Moscow would be
replaying Abkhazia and South Ossetia; a de facto R2P
backed by military muscle.
Under international law - which Washington never
respects, by the way - this is not the same as
"invading" Ukraine. The frankly scary Samantha
Power, the US Ambassador to the United Nations,
would obviously freak out - but that's a dose of her
own medicine. It would indeed be comparable to what
the Americans are doing to the benefit of those
Salafi-jihadis in Syria; and better yet, to what the
US did in Kosovo.
The $50billion vultures
And now, on top of sanctions, Moscow also has to
contend with a massive US$50 billion theft attempt.
The International Arbitration Court in The Hague
found that the Kremlin's pursuit of Yukos and its
main shareholder, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, a decade ago
was politically motivated. Moscow can't appeal - but
it will pursue all legal avenues for trying to get
this ruling "set aside".
Well, it's The Hague's decision itself that is
political. Khodorkovsky was found guilty not only by
the Russian judicial system but also by the European
Court of Human Rights. Yukos and Menotep
shareholders were and remain a bunch of oligarch
gangsters - to put it mildly.
So here's the Empire of Chaos once again in action,
manipulating a Dutch court after literally stealing
Germany's gold and fining France for selling
warships to Russia. In this case though, the "West"
has more investments in Russia than the Russian
government in the West. Payback could be a bitch -
as in Moscow, for instance, freezing all US and EU
energy investments especially in the new
ultra-profitable frontier, the Arctic oil fields.
Western Big Oil will never allow this to happen.
This could go on forever. The bottom line: the
Russian state simply won't allow itself to be robbed
by a dodgy ruling on behalf of a bunch of oligarchs.
In parallel, a case can be made that not only the
Return of the Living (Neo-Con) Dead but also
substantial sections of the deep state in Washington
DC and environs - as well as "Western" plutocracy -
want to provoke some sort of NATO war against
Russia, sooner rather than later.
And in another parallel line, Moscow rumor has it
that the Kremlin finds this protracted post-Yukos
battle just an afterthought compared to the economic
war about to convulse Europe and eventually pit
Europe against Russia: exactly what the Empire of
Chaos is praying - and working - for. "Two Minute"
Hate? Talk about hours, days, weeks, and years.
Source
No comments:
Post a Comment